No California Pipeline

No California Pipeline Website
RSS

Recent Posts

  • Is the South Beach Diet Effective?
  • Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » April » 24
  • Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » May
  • Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » February » 23
  • Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » Public meetings on

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • February 2012
    • January 2012

    Categories

    • Uncategorized

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
    Jan19

    Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » October » 30

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    She formerly advisable that a 2nd software for a several element of the job be permitted. She formerly advised that a second app for a distinct aspect of the job be accredited. A comparable suggestion was made in opposition to the NorthernStar Bradwood proposal, but so significantly that county has failed to heed its very own team, attorneys, and hired experts. The two Clatsop and Coos counties have an option to cease these terminals and pipelines. Pro staff in equally counties have advised Against the terminals. It is really now up to the County Commissions to do the ideal thing and pay attention to the guidance of its employed employees and the public. Here is a press launch from nocaliforniapipeline.com:HEARINGS OFFICER Suggests COOS COUNTY COMMISSION DENIES PORT Permit FOR LNG SLIPIn a just unveiled letter to the Coos County Commission, Hearings Officer Anne Corcoran Briggs has advisable that the Commission deny the International Port of Coos Bay's software for a conditional use allow to dredge out a 45 acre slip in the North Spit of Coos Bay for docking 900-foot extensive tanker ships at a substantial liquefied all-natural fuel final. "There is proof that the reduction of the eelgrass and the reduction of 40 acres of shallow water will adversely influence native fisheries."Briggs' conclusion about the impacts the LNG job on present commerce and other takes advantage of of Lessen Coos Bay was, "I cannot say that the applicant has attained its load of demonstrating the General public Believe in Rights have not been unreasonably impacted."Also cited by Briggs as good reasons to deny the Port's permit software were inadequate specifics from the applicant about the opportunity impacts of growth on Henderson Marsh, and the impacts of redirecting storm water on Coos Bay..

    Jan19

    Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2007 » December » 15

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    In a suprising turn of activities, Coos County's hearings officer advisable that the land use software for the Jordan Cove LNG final be declined. She earlier proposed that a 2nd software for a different portion of the venture be permitted. She formerly advisable that a second application for a several piece of the venture be permitted. Community remark was skewed ten to one in opposition to the job for the duration of hearings in September in Coquille. Citizens Against LNG, Umpqua Watersheds, Close friends of Living Oregon Waters (Movement), the Southern Oregon Pipeline Specifics Job, Oregon Shores, and Sierra Club all labored to persuade the hearings officer that the venture was a threat to the public basic safety, economy, and atmosphere of the Coos Bay Place. A comparable suggestion was produced versus the NorthernStar Bradwood proposal, but so much that county has failed to heed its own staff, attorneys, and employed specialists. Deliberations for the Clatsop County Commission's last determination begins on December 13th. Each Clatsop and Coos counties have an chance to end these final and pipelines. It really is now up to the County Commissions to do the ideal matter and listen to the tips of its hired workers and the general public. Yet, neither the impacts nor the advantages to be derived from the proposed port slip have been independently quantified.""The simple fact that the proposed slip will produce some generic financial rewards in excess of an unspecified timeframe is not sufficient to present that there is a want for this final configuration," Briggs ongoing.

    Jan19

    Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » May » 22

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    In a suprising turn of functions, Coos County's hearings officer proposed that the land use app for the Jordan Cove LNG terminal be declined. Her choice could mark a turning of the tide in the combat against LNG in Southern Oregon. Public remark was skewed 10 to one in opposition to the task through hearings in September in Coquille. Deliberations for the Clatsop County Commission's last selection begins on December 13th. It will be interesting to see whether or not Coos County Commissioners comply with the illustration of the Preparing Commission in Clatsop County, who voted four-three (in a rigged vote) to disregard their staff, attorneys, and authorities and gave NorthernStar a good recommendation to the County Commission. Briggs, who was hired by Coos County to evaluate the permit application submitted by the Port, wrote that her denial advice was primarily based on the applicant "not demonstrating that all applicable approval requirements have been achieved."Exclusively, Briggs wrote she "agreed with opponents that the applicant has not satisfactorily quantified the rewards to the manifeste that justify the enhancement of the maritime terminal as proposed.""The applicant relies on financial scientific studies that demonstrate the proposal, when combined with the LNG amenities, will give an financial profit to the county. On the other hand, neither the impacts nor the positive aspects to be derived from the proposed port slip have been independently quantified.""The simple fact that the proposed slip will create some generic economic advantages over an unspecified timeframe is not more than enough to present that there is a need to have for this terminal configuration," Briggs continued. Briggs went on to say she agreed with opponents that "the Port has not adequately justified the effects of the proposal on commerce, particularly business fishing in the bay, and recreation.

    Jan19

    Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » Griffith says public

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    In a suprising switch of activities, Coos County's hearings officer advised that the land use application for the Jordan Cove LNG final be declined. Citizens Against LNG, Umpqua Watersheds, Mates of Living Oregon Waters (Flow), the Southern Oregon Pipeline Info Challenge, Oregon Shores, and Sierra Club all labored to persuade the hearings officer that the venture was a threat to the community safety, financial system, and environment of the Coos Bay Region. Equally Clatsop and Coos counties have an opportunity to cease these terminals and pipelines. Briggs, who was hired by Coos County to assess the allow app submitted by the Port, wrote that her denial suggestion was based mostly on the applicant "not demonstrating that all relevant approval criteria have been fulfilled."Exclusively, Briggs wrote she "agreed with opponents that the applicant has not satisfactorily quantified the added benefits to the public that justify the advancement of the maritime terminal as proposed.""The applicant relies on economic research that clearly show the proposal, when blended with the LNG services, will supply an economic gain to the county. Briggs went on to say she agreed with opponents that "the Port has not adequately justified the affect of the proposal on commerce, specifically commercial fishing within the bay, and recreation.

    Jan19

    Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » Greenhouse gas

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    Her judgement could mark a turning of the tide in the fight from LNG in Southern Oregon. Citizens Towards LNG, Umpqua Watersheds, Friends of Living Oregon Waters (Stream), the Southern Oregon Pipeline Specifics Venture, Oregon Shores, and Sierra Club all worked to persuade the hearings officer that the venture was a menace to the community basic safety, economic climate, and atmosphere of the Coos Bay Place. Deliberations for the Clatsop County Commission's final final decision begins on December 13th. Both Clatsop and Coos counties have an possibility to avoid these terminals and pipelines. It's now up to the County Commissions to do the suitable thing and hear to the recommendation of its hired employees and the manifeste. Briggs, who was hired by Coos County to assess the allow program submitted by the Port, wrote that her denial recommendation was centered on the applicant "not demonstrating that all relevant approval specifications have been met."Precisely, Briggs wrote she "agreed with opponents that the applicant has not satisfactorily quantified the gains to the community that justify the progress of the marine terminal as proposed.""The applicant relies on financial scientific studies that show the proposal, when mixed with the LNG facilities, will present an financial advantage to the county.

    • Page 5 of 23
    • « First
    • «
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • 7
    • »
    • Last »
    There are currently no widgets assigned to the right-sidebar, place some!

    Once you add widgets to this sidebar, this default information will go away.

    This theme also uses the WordPress 3.0 Menu system. You probably see the default stuff you have in the menubar. Go to Appearance -> Menu in the wp-admin (dashboard) and create a new menu.

    Recommended Plugins

    1. Viper's Video Quicktags
    2. Audio Player
    3. Theme Companion

    ©2012 No California Pipeline | Powered by WordPress with Easel | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑