No California Pipeline

No California Pipeline Website
RSS

Recent Posts

  • Is the South Beach Diet Effective?
  • Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » April » 24
  • Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » May
  • Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » February » 23
  • Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » Public meetings on

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • February 2012
    • January 2012

    Categories

    • Uncategorized

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
    Jan19

    Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » November » 17

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    In a suprising switch of occasions, Coos County's hearings officer advisable that the land use app for the Jordan Cove LNG terminal be rejected. She formerly endorsed that a 2nd application for a various component of the job be permitted. Picture of Web-sitePhoto of Web-siteIn a suprising switch of functions, Coos County's hearings officer encouraged that the land use program for the Jordan Cove LNG terminal be turned down. Her judgement could mark a turning of the tide in the combat versus LNG in Southern Oregon. Citizens Towards LNG, Umpqua Watersheds, Mates of Residing Oregon Waters (Circulation), the Southern Oregon Pipeline Details Undertaking, Oregon Shores, and Sierra Club all worked to persuade the hearings officer that the venture was a threat to the general public protection, marketplace, and surroundings of the Coos Bay Region. Congratulations are in purchase to Jody McCaffree and so many others in Coos Bay and North Bend who have fought this proposal and its involved 223-mile pipeline (called the Pacific Connector). A related recommendation was created towards the NorthernStar Bradwood proposal, but so far that county has failed to heed its unique personnel, attorneys, and employed authorities. Deliberations for the Clatsop County Commission's ultimate final decision commences on December 13th. Pro employees in the two counties have proposed In opposition to the final. Nonetheless, neither the impacts nor the positive aspects to be derived from the proposed port slip have been independently quantified.""The reality that the proposed slip will deliver some generic financial benefits more than an unspecified timeframe is not ample to clearly show that there is a require for this terminal configuration," Briggs continued.

    Jan19

    Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » Majority still against LNG

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    She formerly encouraged that a second app for a distinctive component of the undertaking be accredited. Her selection could mark a turning of the tide in the battle versus LNG in Southern Oregon. Manifeste comment was skewed ten to one in opposition to the venture in the course of hearings in September in Coquille. Briggs, who was hired by Coos County to review the allow software submitted by the Port, wrote that her denial advice was based mostly on the applicant "not demonstrating that all relevant approval expectations have been attained."Precisely, Briggs wrote she "agreed with opponents that the applicant has not satisfactorily quantified the advantages to the manifeste that justify the growth of the marine final as proposed.""The applicant relies on economic tests that present the proposal, when combined with the LNG facilities, will present an financial profit to the county. "There is evidence that the reduction of the eelgrass and the reduction of 40 acres of shallow drinking water will adversely have an affect on regional fisheries."Briggs' conclusion about the impacts the LNG challenge on present commerce and other utilizes of Lower Coos Bay was, "I won't be able to say that the applicant has attained its load of demonstrating the Manifeste Have confidence in Legal rights have not been unreasonably impacted."Also cited by Briggs as purposes to deny the Port's allow software had been inadequate info from the applicant about the prospective impacts of growth on Henderson Marsh, and the impacts of redirecting storm water on Coos Bay..

    Jan19

    Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » October » 9

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    Image of SitePhoto of Web pageIn a suprising turn of events, Coos County's hearings officer encouraged that the land use application for the Jordan Cove LNG terminal be turned down. She previously proposed that a second app for a unique component of the challenge be permitted. Community comment was skewed 10 to 1 in opposition to the undertaking during hearings in September in Coquille. Citizens Towards LNG, Umpqua Watersheds, Mates of Dwelling Oregon Waters (Flow), the Southern Oregon Pipeline Specifics Undertaking, Oregon Shores, and Sierra Club all worked to persuade the hearings officer that the undertaking was a threat to the manifeste safety, overall economy, and setting of the Coos Bay Spot. A very similar suggestion was made from the NorthernStar Bradwood proposal, but so significantly that county has failed to heed its own team, attorneys, and employed authorities. Specialist staff in the two counties have advisable In opposition to the final. Listed here is a press launch from nocaliforniapipeline.com:HEARINGS OFFICER Suggests COOS COUNTY COMMISSION DENIES PORT Allow FOR LNG SLIPIn a just introduced letter to the Coos County Commission, Hearings Officer Anne Corcoran Briggs has encouraged that the Commission deny the Worldwide Port of Coos Bay's app for a conditional use permit to dredge out a 45 acre slip in the North Spit of Coos Bay for docking 900-foot prolonged tanker ships at a enormous liquefied all-natural gas final. However, neither the impacts nor the positive aspects to be derived from the proposed port slip have been independently quantified.""The truth that the proposed slip will bring in some generic financial benefits in excess of an unspecified timeframe is not plenty of to demonstrate that there is a require for this final configuration," Briggs ongoing.

    Jan19

    Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » December » 31

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    Her judgement could mark a turning of the tide in the combat against LNG in Southern Oregon. Citizens In opposition to LNG, Umpqua Watersheds, Pals of Residing Oregon Waters (Movement), the Southern Oregon Pipeline Information and facts Challenge, Oregon Shores, and Sierra Club all labored to persuade the hearings officer that the job was a danger to the general public safety, overall economy, and setting of the Coos Bay Area. Congratulations are in get to Jody McCaffree and so a lot of other people in Coos Bay and North Bend who have fought this proposal and its involved 223-mile pipeline (identified as the Pacific Connector). Deliberations for the Clatsop County Commission's ultimate final decision starts on December 13th. It will be intriguing to see no matter whether Coos County Commissioners go along with the instance of the Organizing Commission in Clatsop County, who voted four-3 (in a rigged vote) to ignore their personnel, attorneys, and experts and gave NorthernStar a favourable advice to the County Commission. Briggs, who was employed by Coos County to examine the permit software submitted by the Port, wrote that her denial suggestion was based mostly on the applicant "not demonstrating that all relevant approval criteria have been satisfied."Precisely, Briggs wrote she "agreed with opponents that the applicant has not satisfactorily quantified the added benefits to the public that justify the development of the marine final as proposed.""The applicant relies on financial tests that exhibit the proposal, when put together with the LNG services, will supply an financial benefit to the county.

    Jan19

    Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » February » 18

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    In a suprising flip of gatherings, Coos County's hearings officer endorsed that the land use software for the Jordan Cove LNG terminal be declined. Her choice could mark a turning of the tide in the fight in opposition to LNG in Southern Oregon. Image of Internet sitePhotograph of Web pageIn a suprising switch of celebrations, Coos County's hearings officer advisable that the land use program for the Jordan Cove LNG terminal be turned down. She earlier encouraged that a 2nd application for a diverse aspect of the project be permitted. Her decision could mark a turning of the tide in the fight towards LNG in Southern Oregon. Congratulations are in purchase to Jody McCaffree and so countless others in Coos Bay and North Bend who have fought this proposal and its connected 223-mile pipeline (identified as the Pacific Connector). It will be exciting to see whether or not Coos County Commissioners adhere to the instance of the Organizing Commission in Clatsop County, who voted four-three (in a rigged vote) to ignore their staff, attorneys, and professionals and gave NorthernStar a favourable advice to the County Commission. Skilled personnel in each counties have endorsed In opposition to the terminals. Listed here is a press release from nocaliforniapipeline.com:HEARINGS OFFICER Suggests COOS COUNTY COMMISSION DENIES PORT Allow FOR LNG SLIPIn a just produced letter to the Coos County Commission, Hearings Officer Anne Corcoran Briggs has endorsed that the Commission deny the Global Port of Coos Bay's software for a conditional use permit to dredge out a 45 acre slip in the North Spit of Coos Bay for docking 900-foot prolonged tanker ships at a enormous liquefied pure gasoline final.

    • Page 4 of 23
    • « First
    • «
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
    • »
    • Last »
    There are currently no widgets assigned to the right-sidebar, place some!

    Once you add widgets to this sidebar, this default information will go away.

    This theme also uses the WordPress 3.0 Menu system. You probably see the default stuff you have in the menubar. Go to Appearance -> Menu in the wp-admin (dashboard) and create a new menu.

    Recommended Plugins

    1. Viper's Video Quicktags
    2. Audio Player
    3. Theme Companion

    ©2012 No California Pipeline | Powered by WordPress with Easel | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑