No California Pipeline

No California Pipeline Website
RSS

Recent Posts

  • Is the South Beach Diet Effective?
  • Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » April » 24
  • Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » May
  • Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » February » 23
  • Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » Public meetings on

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • February 2012
    • January 2012

    Categories

    • Uncategorized

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
    Jan19

    Put a Stop to Eminent Domain ::: No California Pipeline – Pipe Up To

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    She earlier recommended that a 2nd app for a several aspect of the job be accredited. She previously advised that a 2nd program for a various element of the task be accepted. Community remark was skewed ten to one in opposition to the venture while in hearings in September in Coquille. Congratulations are in buy to Jody McCaffree and so several others in Coos Bay and North Bend who have fought this proposal and its affiliated 223-mile pipeline (called the Pacific Connector). A comparable advice was constructed against the NorthernStar Bradwood proposal, but so far that county has failed to heed its very own team, attorneys, and employed authorities. It will be fascinating to see if Coos County Commissioners follow the instance of the Planning Commission in Clatsop County, who voted four-3 (in a rigged vote) to disregard their team, attorneys, and pros and gave NorthernStar a positive advice to the County Commission. The two Clatsop and Coos counties have an option to quit these terminals and pipelines. Listed here is a press release from nocaliforniapipeline.com:HEARINGS OFFICER Recommends COOS COUNTY COMMISSION DENIES PORT Permit FOR LNG SLIPIn a just unveiled letter to the Coos County Commission, Hearings Officer Anne Corcoran Briggs has endorsed that the Commission deny the International Port of Coos Bay's application for a conditional use permit to dredge out a forty five acre slip in the North Spit of Coos Bay for docking 900-foot long tanker ships at a large liquefied pure fuel terminal. Briggs went on to say she agreed with opponents that "the Port has not adequately justified the impact of the proposal on commerce, namely business fishing in the bay, and recreation.

    Jan19

    News Headlines & Media 2008 ::: No California Pipeline – Pipe Up

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    In a suprising flip of events, Coos County's hearings officer endorsed that the land use app for the Jordan Cove LNG terminal be rejected. Her choice could mark a turning of the tide in the battle against LNG in Southern Oregon. Picture of Internet sitePicture of WebsiteIn a suprising flip of events, Coos County's hearings officer recommended that the land use app for the Jordan Cove LNG terminal be rejected. Her final decision could mark a turning of the tide in the fight versus LNG in Southern Oregon. A equivalent recommendation was constructed versus the NorthernStar Bradwood proposal, but so much that county has failed to heed its private staff, attorneys, and employed pros. Deliberations for the Clatsop County Commission's last conclusion commences on December 13th. It will be appealing to see if Coos County Commissioners adhere to the case in point of the Preparing Commission in Clatsop County, who voted 4-three (in a rigged vote) to disregard their personnel, attorneys, and gurus and gave NorthernStar a constructive suggestion to the County Commission. The two Clatsop and Coos counties have an opportunity to halt these terminals and pipelines. Briggs, who was employed by Coos County to consider the permit app submitted by the Port, wrote that her denial advice was based on the applicant "not demonstrating that all applicable approval expectations have been satisfied."Especially, Briggs wrote she "agreed with opponents that the applicant has not satisfactorily quantified the advantages to the community that justify the advancement of the marine terminal as proposed.""The applicant relies on economic tests that exhibit the proposal, when blended with the LNG facilities, will present an financial gain to the county.

    Jan19

    Contact Government Agencies ::: No California Pipeline – Pipe Up

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    In a suprising turn of activities, Coos County's hearings officer endorsed that the land use app for the Jordan Cove LNG terminal be declined. Her choice could mark a turning of the tide in the combat versus LNG in Southern Oregon. Photograph of SitePhotograph of SiteIn a suprising turn of celebrations, Coos County's hearings officer advised that the land use application for the Jordan Cove LNG terminal be rejected. Public comment was skewed 10 to 1 in opposition to the task all through hearings in September in Coquille. Specialist employees in equally counties have recommended Versus the terminals. It is really now up to the County Commissions to do the suitable point and hear to the suggestions of its hired employees and the public. The following is a press launch from nocaliforniapipeline.com:HEARINGS OFFICER Recommends COOS COUNTY COMMISSION DENIES PORT Permit FOR LNG SLIPIn a just unveiled letter to the Coos County Commission, Hearings Officer Anne Corcoran Briggs has recommended that the Commission deny the Worldwide Port of Coos Bay's program for a conditional use allow to dredge out a forty five acre slip in the North Spit of Coos Bay for docking 900-foot extended tanker ships at a considerable liquefied pure gas terminal. Nonetheless, neither the impacts nor the features to be derived from the proposed port slip have been independently quantified.""The actuality that the proposed slip will bring in some generic financial added benefits through an unspecified timeframe is not more than enough to show that there is a desire for this terminal configuration," Briggs continued.

    • Page 23 of 23
    • « First
    • «
    • 19
    • 20
    • 21
    • 22
    • 23
    There are currently no widgets assigned to the right-sidebar, place some!

    Once you add widgets to this sidebar, this default information will go away.

    This theme also uses the WordPress 3.0 Menu system. You probably see the default stuff you have in the menubar. Go to Appearance -> Menu in the wp-admin (dashboard) and create a new menu.

    Recommended Plugins

    1. Viper's Video Quicktags
    2. Audio Player
    3. Theme Companion

    ©2012 No California Pipeline | Powered by WordPress with Easel | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑