No California Pipeline

No California Pipeline Website
RSS

Recent Posts

  • Is the South Beach Diet Effective?
  • Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » April » 24
  • Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » May
  • Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2008 » February » 23
  • Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » Public meetings on

Recent Comments

    Archives

    • February 2012
    • January 2012

    Categories

    • Uncategorized

    Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
    Jan19

    Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » First LNG shipment

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    In a suprising flip of occasions, Coos County's hearings officer proposed that the land use program for the Jordan Cove LNG terminal be rejected. Photograph of WebsitePicture of Web siteIn a suprising switch of gatherings, Coos County's hearings officer endorsed that the land use app for the Jordan Cove LNG terminal be rejected. Congratulations are in get to Jody McCaffree and so several some others in Coos Bay and North Bend who have fought this proposal and its affiliated 223-mile pipeline (referred to as the Pacific Connector). Right here is a press release from nocaliforniapipeline.com:HEARINGS OFFICER Suggests COOS COUNTY COMMISSION DENIES PORT Permit FOR LNG SLIPIn a just produced letter to the Coos County Commission, Hearings Officer Anne Corcoran Briggs has suggested that the Commission deny the Global Port of Coos Bay's program for a conditional use permit to dredge out a 45 acre slip in the North Spit of Coos Bay for docking 900-foot extended tanker ships at a significant liquefied purely natural fuel final. "There is proof that the reduction of the eelgrass and the reduction of 40 acres of shallow water will adversely have an effect on regional fisheries."Briggs' summary about the impacts the LNG challenge on existing commerce and other employs of Reduced Coos Bay was, "I are unable to say that the applicant has satisfied its stress of demonstrating the Public Trust Rights have not been unreasonably affected."Also cited by Briggs as explanations to deny the Port's allow app have been inadequate info from the applicant about the probable impacts of enhancement on Henderson Marsh, and the impacts of redirecting storm h2o on Coos Bay..

    Jan19

    Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » Reality crossing

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    She earlier endorsed that a second software for a several part of the job be accepted. She earlier suggested that a 2nd app for a distinctive piece of the job be approved. General public remark was skewed ten to one in opposition to the job while in hearings in September in Coquille. Congratulations are in get to Jody McCaffree and so many other people in Coos Bay and North Bend who have fought this proposal and its connected 223-mile pipeline (identified as the Pacific Connector). A very similar recommendation was made against the NorthernStar Bradwood proposal, but so far that county has failed to heed its possess staff, attorneys, and hired authorities. Deliberations for the Clatsop County Commission's final choice starts on December 13th. You'll find it now up to the County Commissions to do the appropriate issue and hear to the recommendation of its hired personnel and the manifeste. Here is a press launch from nocaliforniapipeline.com:HEARINGS OFFICER Suggests COOS COUNTY COMMISSION DENIES PORT Allow FOR LNG SLIPIn a just released letter to the Coos County Commission, Hearings Officer Anne Corcoran Briggs has advisable that the Commission deny the Worldwide Port of Coos Bay's app for a conditional use allow to dredge out a 45 acre slip in the North Spit of Coos Bay for docking 900-foot very long tanker ships at a significant liquefied all-natural gasoline terminal. Briggs went on to say she agreed with opponents that "the Port has not adequately justified the effects of the proposal on commerce, namely industrial fishing within just the bay, and recreation.

    Jan19

    Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2009 » February » 23

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    In a suprising turn of gatherings, Coos County's hearings officer advised that the land use software for the Jordan Cove LNG terminal be turned down. Her judgement could mark a turning of the tide in the fight against LNG in Southern Oregon. Image of Web pagePhoto of SiteIn a suprising flip of occasions, Coos County's hearings officer proposed that the land use app for the Jordan Cove LNG final be rejected. She earlier proposed that a 2nd software for a unique aspect of the project be accepted. It will be unique to see whether or not Coos County Commissioners observe the instance of the Setting up Commission in Clatsop County, who voted 4-three (in a rigged vote) to ignore their employees, attorneys, and industry experts and gave NorthernStar a beneficial recommendation to the County Commission. Equally Clatsop and Coos counties have an option to quit these terminals and pipelines. Briggs, who was hired by Coos County to consider the allow software submitted by the Port, wrote that her denial recommendation was centered on the applicant "not demonstrating that all applicable approval expectations have been attained."Precisely, Briggs wrote she "agreed with opponents that the applicant has not satisfactorily quantified the gains to the community that justify the enhancement of the maritime terminal as proposed.""The applicant relies on economic research that exhibit the proposal, when mixed with the LNG amenities, will deliver an financial benefit to the county. Even so, neither the impacts nor the features to be derived from the proposed port slip have been independently quantified.""The point that the proposed slip will bring in some generic economic added benefits in excess of an unspecified timeframe is not adequate to exhibit that there is a desire for this final configuration," Briggs ongoing.

    Jan19

    Contact Us ::: No California Pipeline – Pipe Up To Oppose The

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    She formerly proposed that a second app for a distinct portion of the challenge be approved. Her choice could mark a turning of the tide in the battle from LNG in Southern Oregon. Photo of Internet sitePhotograph of Web siteIn a suprising flip of occasions, Coos County's hearings officer advised that the land use application for the Jordan Cove LNG terminal be rejected. Her decision could mark a turning of the tide in the fight towards LNG in Southern Oregon. Community comment was skewed ten to one in opposition to the job for the duration of hearings in September in Coquille. It will be appealing to see if Coos County Commissioners follow the instance of the Preparing Commission in Clatsop County, who voted four-three (in a rigged vote) to ignore their workers, attorneys, and authorities and gave NorthernStar a good recommendation to the County Commission. Both equally Clatsop and Coos counties have an option to avoid these terminals and pipelines. Here is a press launch from nocaliforniapipeline.com:HEARINGS OFFICER Recommends COOS COUNTY COMMISSION DENIES PORT Allow FOR LNG SLIPIn a just introduced letter to the Coos County Commission, Hearings Officer Anne Corcoran Briggs has proposed that the Commission deny the Worldwide Port of Coos Bay's application for a conditional use allow to dredge out a forty five acre slip in the North Spit of Coos Bay for docking 900-foot lengthy tanker ships at a huge liquefied healthy fuel final.

    Jan19

    Endorsements ::: No California Pipeline – Pipe Up To Oppose The

    by Admin on January 19th, 2012 at 5:52 am
    Posted In: Uncategorized

    She formerly suggested that a 2nd program for a several piece of the undertaking be authorized. General public comment was skewed ten to one in opposition to the job throughout hearings in September in Coquille. Citizens In opposition to LNG, Umpqua Watersheds, Buddies of Dwelling Oregon Waters (Movement), the Southern Oregon Pipeline Facts Task, Oregon Shores, and Sierra Club all worked to persuade the hearings officer that the job was a risk to the manifeste basic safety, economy, and surroundings of the Coos Bay Place. Congratulations are in get to Jody McCaffree and so a lot of many others in Coos Bay and North Bend who have fought this proposal and its tied in 223-mile pipeline (known as the Pacific Connector). Each Clatsop and Coos counties have an ability to prevent these terminals and pipelines. Even so, neither the impacts nor the features to be derived from the proposed port slip have been independently quantified.""The truth that the proposed slip will bring in some generic financial benefits around an unspecified timeframe is not more than enough to present that there is a require for this terminal configuration," Briggs continued. "There is proof that the reduction of the eelgrass and the loss of 40 acres of shallow h2o will adversely change local fisheries."Briggs' summary about the impacts the LNG job on current commerce and other takes advantage of of Lessen Coos Bay was, "I cannot say that the applicant has met its load of demonstrating the Community Have confidence in Rights have not been unreasonably impacted."Also cited by Briggs as causes to deny the Port's permit program have been inadequate data from the applicant about the prospective impacts of improvement on Henderson Marsh, and the impacts of redirecting storm drinking water on Coos Bay..

    • Page 2 of 23
    • «
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • »
    • Last »
    There are currently no widgets assigned to the right-sidebar, place some!

    Once you add widgets to this sidebar, this default information will go away.

    This theme also uses the WordPress 3.0 Menu system. You probably see the default stuff you have in the menubar. Go to Appearance -> Menu in the wp-admin (dashboard) and create a new menu.

    Recommended Plugins

    1. Viper's Video Quicktags
    2. Audio Player
    3. Theme Companion

    ©2012 No California Pipeline | Powered by WordPress with Easel | Subscribe: RSS | Back to Top ↑