Pipe Up to Oppose The California Pipeline! » 2007 » February

She formerly proposed that a second application for a various portion of the venture be accepted. Photo of WebsitePicture of Web pageIn a suprising flip of activities, Coos County's hearings officer advised that the land use app for the Jordan Cove LNG final be turned down. She earlier encouraged that a 2nd app for a unique element of the venture be authorized. It will be fascinating to see if Coos County Commissioners adhere to the example of the Considering Commission in Clatsop County, who voted 4-3 (in a rigged vote) to dismiss their staff, attorneys, and industry experts and gave NorthernStar a good suggestion to the County Commission. The two Clatsop and Coos counties have an opportunity to stop these final and pipelines. Qualified employees in both equally counties have recommended Versus the terminals. Briggs, who was employed by Coos County to assess the permit app submitted by the Port, wrote that her denial advice was centered on the applicant "not demonstrating that all applicable approval standards have been achieved."In particular, Briggs wrote she "agreed with opponents that the applicant has not satisfactorily quantified the positive aspects to the community that justify the improvement of the maritime terminal as proposed.""The applicant relies on financial research that indicate the proposal, when mixed with the LNG services, will give an financial profit to the county. Having said that, neither the impacts nor the features to be derived from the proposed port slip have been independently quantified.""The truth that the proposed slip will generate some generic financial rewards in excess of an unspecified timeframe is not adequate to clearly show that there is a want for this final configuration," Briggs ongoing.

Comments are closed.